Risk taking and 'progress'?
Risk taking and 'progress'?
Speculation is still raging about the causes of the catastrophic loss of the Titan submersible. Ahead of the formal investigation and enquiry many are speculating as to the cocktail of errors which may have been responsible.
One insightful commentary comes from transport safety expert, Professor George Bearfield in which he highlights the development of this vessel outside normal regulatory processes. He diagnoses an underlying causal factor as a situation "...where a strong appetite for risk and profit is coincident with weak or ineffective regulation." This seems to say it all.
I have spent my whole professional life arguing one way or another against deregulation in safety, the case for it usually being advanced by those who seem to glorify almost any level of risk taking as a necessary part of innovation and 'progress'.
Of course, especially as we try new things, we all have to make the best decisions we can in the face of multiple uncertainties - but the old engineer's adage "If it can happen it must not matter. If it can matter it must not happen" comes to mind.
RoSPA Member? Login to your MyRoSPA to continue reading or join today
Login to you MyRoSPA account
Login to MyRoSPA to view more exclusive content
Login
| Join RoSPA
Become a member now
Become a member to access MyRoSPA to view more exclusive content
Join
RoSPA Member? Login to your MyRoSPA to continue reading or join today
Login to you MyRoSPA account
Login to MyRoSPA to view some more exclusive content
Login
| Join RoSPA
Become a member now
Become a part of the MyRoSPA team to view more exclusive content
Register